Can High Frequency Trading Be Defined?

Earlier this week, US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) gathered several wise men to discuss how many angels could dance on the head of a pin. Actually, during the meeting of the regulator's Technology Advisory Committee, the discussion turned to a problem that was, amazingly, similar—how to define high-frequency trading.
Most were there to respond the CFTC commissioner Scott O'Malia's request to help the regulator develop a solid definition that extends beyond “I know it when I see it.”
I've always found it silly to attempt to create objective definitions for things that by definition are subjective, such as high-frequency trading and even best execution. Depending on your perspective, it is difficult to know what is “high-frequency” and what is “best.” The last-place finisher in a 100-meter dash might not be considered fast by Olympic standards, but I know he is certainly faster than I am.
Coming up with an objective definition for high-frequency trading will require selecting arbitrary thresholds. However, those thresholds need to be logical and defensible. In any high-frequency trading conversation the same terms always come up—latency, automation, proximity, aggressiveness and other related words.
As the CFTC's chief economist Andrei Kirilenko mentioned during the committee's discussion, measuring and collecting data on these terms would prove exceedingly complicated.
Kirilenko and his colleagues researched 15,000 trading accounts, examined each account's intraday and end-of-day trading inventory and found that only 16 accounts behaved in what they would term a “high-frequency” manner. In fact, they saw these accounts acting more as "appendages of the matching engine" by providing additional order-matching capabilities. Without them, says Kirilenko, there would be significantly more resting orders on the exchange's order book.
One suggestion, which I believe has merit, comes from Richard Gorelick, CEO of private trading firm RMG Advisors. Gorelick says regulators should avoid establishing arbitrary trading thresholds and look to regulate trades coming from automated trading systems. The data on which orders come from automated trading systems and who runs them is already being collected by exchanges and could be accessed easily by the CFTC if necessary.
No matter what the final definition is, the CFTC will need to make sure that the metrics it relies on are easily measured and collected. But knowing how regulators have worked in the past in developing definitions and standards, I'm not holding my breath.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
ICE’s snowball effect: Intercontinental Exchange keeps leash tight on infrastructure
Voice of the CTO: Stuart Williams talks about why the exchange has been so adamant about “controlling” its infrastructure and technology, and how that helped it manage intense market volatility.
Aussie super fund overhauls investment platform with BlackRock Aladdin
Aware Super’s Project Odin includes implementations of BlackRock Aladdin, eFront and GoldenSource EDM
Nasdaq looks to Thailand, Broadridge grows patent portfolio, GenAI concerns, and more
The Waters Cooler: MarketAxess gains majority control of RFQ consortium, the Bloomberg Terminal integrates with BNP’s Exane, and Isda extends reg reporting support to new Canadian rules in this week’s news roundup.
Growing pains: Why good data and fortitude are crucial for banks’ tech projects
The IMD Wrap: Max examines recent WatersTechnology deep dives into long-term technology projects at several firms and the role data plays in those efforts.
Overnight trading gets another boost with deal between FactSet’s LiquidityBook and Blue Ocean
FactSet’s recently acquired LiquidityBook OMS will grant buy-side clients access to overnight trading on Blue Ocean.
Optiver relies on BMLL market data for quant strategy
The market-maker has built its trading business on top of BMLL’s Level 3 data. But the collaboration is young, and the pair have grand plans to make options the next quant frontier.
Bloomberg expands IBVAL; the SIPs and 24/5 trading; Broadridge’s agentic play, and more
The Waters Cooler: State Street embraces interop, Citi’s CIO outlines the XiNG risk platform, power companies explore alternative nuclear supply options to datacenters, and more.
State Street’s interop play for FX and easing technical debt
Waters Wrap: About six years ago, State Street partnered with Interop.io to tie together its GlobalLINK suite of platforms. Anthony explores how this plays into the “reuse” mantra.