December 2018: Getting There
Data management is more about striving than finalizing.

Whether the goal is compliance, a coveted technological breakthrough or truly, robustly streamlined data management, sometimes it seems like the work within the capital markets data space is less about churn and more about striving to grasp something just out of reach.
End of year is a good time to reflect on what it takes to get there, wherever there may be. Nearly a full year past Mifid II implementation, data managers are now anticipating Mifid III and whatever demands it may bring. Firms that have mastered their data governance—and the tech companies that supply the tools to make data hum—may feel comfortable with their systems, until they recall the uncertainty surrounding Brexit and its aftermath. And of course, there is always room for innovation, disruption be damned.
In this issue, I round out my series on semantics with an exploration of the power of standards and ontologies, sizing up their capacity on a macro, data-management level, as well as revealing how semantics can identify risk and generate insights that pay off on the trading floor. My discussions with the people doing the important, groundbreaking work in standards reveal what it will take for the industry to get to the point where semantics’ potential becomes reality.
Wei-Shen Wong’s feature on corporate actions also talks about potential, but from the perspective of missed opportunities: specifically, billions of dollars lost as a result of asset managers failing to process corporate actions. Anthony Malakian investigates how banks, asset managers and vendors are toying with the potential of deep learning with a report that highlights successful initiatives, reveals which experiments have failed and why, and demonstrates how deep learning can bring value, if only firms can get there.
In her analysis of what make a good replacement for Libor, Amelia Axelson explores a lingering area of doubt: what will happen when the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) makes tracks. Right now, there is consensus that a data-driven benchmark is the best plan, but experts are still searching for a suitable substitute as Libor’s deadline draws near. With the Mifid II deadline far in the rearview mirror, Hamad Ali weighs the winners and losers, and reveals which of the regulation’s issues remain unresolved. The end of 2017 was all about Mifid II, but the end of 2018 seems to be more about firms internalizing that their compliance obligations are not complete — and they might never get there.
More on Regulation
Doing a deal? Prioritize info security early
Engaging information security teams early in licensing deals can deliver better results and catch potential issues. Neglecting them can cause delays and disruption, writes Devexperts’ Heetesh Rawal in this op-ed.
SEC pulls rulemaking proposals in bid for course correction
The regulator withdrew 14 Gensler-era proposals, including the controversial predictive data analytics proposal.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
The Consolidated Audit Trail faces an uncertain fate—yet again
Waters Wrap: The CAT is up and running, but with a conservative SEC in place and renewed pressure from politicians and exchanges, Anthony says the controversial database faces a death by a thousand cuts.
Exchanges plead with SEC to trim CAT reporting requirements
Letters from Cboe, Nasdaq and NYSE ask that the new Atkins administration reduce the amount of data required for the Consolidated Audit Trail, and scrap options data collection entirely.
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.
Friendly fire? Nasdaq squeezes MTF competitors with steep fee increase
The stock exchange almost tripled the prices of some datasets for multilateral trading facilities, with sources saying the move is the latest effort by exchanges to offset declining trading revenues.
Europe is counting its vendors—and souring on US tech
Under DORA, every financial company with business in the EU must report use of their critical vendors. Deadlines vary, but the message doesn’t: The EU is taking stock of technology dependencies, especially upon US providers.