Rob Daly: The Telltale Trade
Someone owes high-frequency traders everywhere an apology. After the events of the May 6 Flash Crash, almost everyone believed that high-frequency traders on the US cash equities markets were responsible for causing the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) to plummet nearly 1,000 points in a matter of minutes, and forcing approximately 300 issues to trade at stub-quote prices.
Thanks to the report recently released jointly by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the world knows that what caused the Flash Crash was in fact the complete opposite of the general consensus at the time of the event.
It didn’t start with nefarious plots by high-frequency traders that later infected the US futures markets. Instead, regulators attribute the day’s events to a trade by a fundamentals trader at asset manager Waddell & Reed, who tried to unload 75,000 E-Mini S&P 500 contracts in a space of 20 minutes using an unsophisticated volume-driven algorithm.
Once the trade hit an already skittish market—thanks to the fears about Greek sovereign debt—things began rolling downhill fast. High-frequency traders absorbed as much of the new liquidity as they could before clearing their books. However, it was too late, as the equities and exchange-traded fund (ETF) traders stepped back from their trading once they saw the imbalance between their prices and those of the E-Mini contracts. Trade internalizers also selectively started to route retail market orders to the exchanges rather than commit their own capital, further accelerating the market’s drop.
There are many lessons to learn from the SEC–CFTC report. One surprise is that the regulators did not take the opportunity to make further regulatory recommendations. How could they? Between the industry-wide circuit-breaker pilot program and the proposed consolidated audit trail (CAT), there is not much more they can do to eliminate future flash crashes.
The cause wasn’t a systemic issue; it simply was an inopportune trade made when the trader didn’t know the full depth of the market. It could have happened to anyone.
Yet, there is something to say about the wisdom of trying to push through such a large order in such a short amount of time using a fire-and-forget algorithm. According to the report, the sell algorithm did not take in account the price or timing of the E-Mini trades. It just looked for 9 percent of the transacted volume that occurred in the previous minute. In a down market, that algorithm would quickly lead to a major market imbalance.
The first thing that sprung to mind when I read that description was The Sorcerer’s Apprentice segment from Walt Disney’s Fantasia, where one well-meaning act cascades into a deluge of trouble.
I wonder how many risk management systems would have had the ability to identify the knock-on effects of such a trade. Judging from the fallout from May 6, not many. Then again, what responsibility does a trading firm have for the results of its trades if there was no premeditated malfeasance? Poor timing isn’t a crime.
Unless regulators plan to start licensing trading algorithms and their use, flash crashes will be the price the market pays for improved efficiency and interconnectedness. Hopefully the market-wide circuit-breakers strategy will work and arrest any future runaway markets.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Systematic tools gain favor in fixed income
Automation is enabling systematic strategies in fixed income that were previously reserved for equities trading. The tech gap between the two may be closing, but differences remain.
Waters Wrap: Examining the changing EMS landscape
After LSEG’s decision to sunset Redi, Anthony examines what might lie ahead for the EMS space.
This Week: Clear Street, AXA/AWS, TD Bank/Google Cloud and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
LSEG to sunset Redi EMS in favor of Tora
Sources say competitors will look to seize on the decision to win over Redi’s sizeable US client base.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 10 years of our best content.
Getting aggressive: Overbond uses AI to assess dealer axes
The fixed-income analytics specialist has developed a new tool to help buy-side firms decide if they’re getting a good price from their dealers.
TS Imagine integrates LTX’s pre-trade analytics tool
Users of the fixed-income EMS will now have access to LTX’s Liquidity Cloud tool, which provides a pre-trade score for the likelihood of trading success.
Most read
- Sell-Side Technology Awards 2024: All the winners
- Deutsche Börse democratizes data with Marketplace offering
- Sell-Side Technology Awards 2024: Best sell-side front-office platform—Bloomberg