November 2018: Data and Tech Couples Therapy
Data and technology have a co-dependent relationship, for better or for worse.
WatersTechnology editor-in-chief Victor Anderson and I have done some hiring together, and whenever he describes for candidates the relationship between data and technology, he always uses a biological analogy: If technology is the bones of the market, data is the blood. And while data and tech’s co-dependent relationship is has reached official adage status, the relationship itself changes as the market evolves, so there are always fresh questions to answer and surprising new angles to consider.
For our sibling publication WatersTechnology, Anthony Malakian provides a thorough examination of this evolution through the lens of alternative data, as firms looking to cash in on the alt data boom are navigating how to prioritize while they compete with other hungry banks, traditional data vendors and among their own internal businesses.
I continue my focus on semantics with a feature explaining how, when it comes to standards and ontologies, the dependency runs both ways: Brilliant ideas in semantics require technology capable of carrying them out, while technological advancements— such as blockchain—need standards in place to progress.
For his analysis of firms with a technology vendor arm developed within, Max Bowie considers the sometimes-fraught tech and data relationship with an eye on strategy and timing. Should in-house leave the nest, and if so, when?
And as March 2019 approaches, Brexit concerns continue to heat up. While politicians negotiate (or don’t, as the case may be), regulators realize there is one topic that is non-negotiable: Data must continue to fl ow between agencies and across borders to keep catastrophe at bay. James Rundle and Amelia Axelsen team up to break down what options the regulators have to keep data moving to where it is necessary and reveal why so far, none of the solutions appear sufficient to solve the problem of data, Brexit and borders.
This November issue is sent off right after my return from Hong Kong, where I attended the Asian-Pacific Financial Information Conference. Our Asia editor, Wei-Shen Wong, and I will publish stories culled from APFIC 2018 on WatersTechnology.com over the coming weeks, but I thought I’d tip you off to some early themes: cloud is still a popular topic, but perhaps not as popular as alternative and environmental, social and governance (ESG) data—where to get it, what to do with it, how to use it in a way that is both effective and compliant, and ultimately, whether its returns are worth the cost.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
Data standardization is the ‘trust accelerator’ for broader AI adoption
In this guest column, data product managers at Fitch Solutions explain AI’s impact on credit and investment risk management.
As AI pressures mount, banks split on how to handle staffing
Benchmarking: Over the next 12 months, almost a third of G-Sib respondents said they plan to decrease headcount in their data function.
Everyone wants to tokenize the assets. What about the data?
The IMD Wrap: With exchanges moving market data on-chain, Wei-Shen believes there’s a need to standardize licensing agreements.
FIX Trading Community recommends data practices for European CTs
The industry association has published practices and workflows using FIX messaging standards for the upcoming EU consolidated tapes.
TCB Data-Broadhead pairing highlights challenges of market data management
Waters Wrap: The vendors are hoping that blending TCB’s reporting infrastructure with Broadhead’s DLT-backed digital contract and auditing engine will be the cure for data rights management.
CME, LSEG align on market data licensing in GenAI era
The two major exchanges say they are licensing the use case—not the technology.
Data infrastructure must keep pace with pension funds’ private market ambitions
As private markets grow in the UK, Keith Viverito says the infrastructure that underpins the sector needs to be improved, or these initiatives will fail.
AI enthusiasts are running before they can walk
The IMD Wrap: As firms race to implement generative and agentic AI, having solid data foundations is crucial, but Wei-Shen wonders how many have put those foundations in.